MoosedHistory
Menu
Black History

Black History

Redlining: no covenant, no survey, no developer — a named gap

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

Named gap — settlers current, November 2026

The word redlining appears nowhere in the build's mirror, and nothing beneath the word was reached either — no covenant text, no federal survey, no developer's line — so the item is banked as a named gap, with the instruments that could settle it named one by one. What was tested and not found, at reached strength: a racial covenant in any Lakeville or Union Township deed carried in this build (the deed record the build holds runs to the settlement's own purchases, which carry no covenant in the carriers reached); a Home Owners' Loan Corporation survey or grade for the town — the HOLC mapped cities, and no survey of Lakeville stands in any carrier reached; and a named developer whose plat or policy drew the line, for a town whose one modern subdivision, the Morningside of the plan's account, stands in the record without a racial term printed. The settlers are named and current: the HOLC's St. Joseph County mapping record, and a covenant sweep of Union Township deeds at the county Recorder's office. The gap is stated without softening: the mechanisms of twentieth-century housing exclusion, documented for the county's cities, are unexamined for this township in any source reached, and the leg prints the examination as owed.

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: Redlining: no covenant, no survey, no developer — a named gap, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/lakeville/black-history/redlining-no-covenant-no-survey-no-developer-a-named/