MoosedHistory
Menu
Wineries & Distilleries

Wineries & Distilleries

The Meadery-Winery Form, Tested Separately — Nothing Ferments Honey in the Record

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

Banked record, Wineries & Distilleries; ATC permit taxonomy (in.gov); this lane's searches, November 2026

The leg's modern negative rested on winery directories alone, and the meadery-winery form — the farm winery fermenting honey and fruit alongside grape — was never separately tested; it is tested here. The class exists in the instrument: Farm Winery stands as permit type 305 in the ATC taxonomy carried in the article above, so a Lakeville or county meadery-winery would have a class to appear under. In the directories and lists reached, none appears: no meadery, and no farm-winery permittee, for Lakeville or for St. Joseph County surfaces in any carrier opened — the county's modern fermentation record remains the South Bend distillery and the South Bend vineyard of the articles above, both grape-and-grain, neither honey. The residue is stated at its honest size and is the reason the row closes mixed rather than clean: the farm-winery and meadery permit records themselves — the audit's settler — were not queried directly, standing behind the same unrun ATC query as the distillers gap, and they are named and current. The form is tested at directory strength and found empty; the permit-strength test awaits the same door as its neighbour article.

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: The Meadery-Winery Form, Tested Separately — Nothing Ferments Honey in the Record, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/lakeville/wineries-distilleries/meadery-winery-form-tested-separately-nothing-ferments-honey-in/