The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.
TESTED 2026
A city that counted 107 Black residents in 1970 invites the question, and this record asks it in the open: was Mishawaka a sundown town — a place that excluded Black people by ordinance, sign, or enforced custom after dark? The tests run return no confirmation in either direction. Mishawaka does not appear among the Indiana entries in the sundown-town lists reached (Greensburg, Greenwood, Howell in Evansville, Linton, Martinsville and Salem are listed; this city is not). No ordinance, sign, expulsion or enforcement incident is documented in any source reached. The standard scholarly database of sundown towns, maintained at Tougaloo College from James Loewen's work, was opened but its database was not readable in the fetch, so a Mishawaka entry there is unverified, not absent. Against the classic sundown pattern stands one documented continuity: a Black family lived in Mishawaka openly from 1868, buried its dead here, and sent its children through the common school — a record no enforced sundown regime usually permits. And the near-absence itself has documented mechanisms of other kinds in this section: a one-family base that never drew a migration, covenants written into new subdivisions, two redlined districts, and plant hiring whose record is silence. The question is therefore printed as open: not documented as a sundown town in the sources reached, not cleared by them either, with the database read named as the settling test.
Sources
- The sundown-town lists reached (the Indiana entries of the standard compilations) — Mishawaka not listed.
- Loewen / Tougaloo College sundown towns database (justice.tougaloo.edu) — opened; database not text-readable in the fetch; entry unverified either way.
- This section, entries blk-powells, blk-housing, blk-work — the documented continuity and the documented mechanisms.