MoosedHistory
Menu
City Controversies

City Controversies

Pay-to-Play: the Pattern Across the State

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

Tested November 2026 — no Mishawaka ordinance, veto or injunction found

The test: The pattern case is a city ordinance tying campaign contributions to city contracts, fought through vetoes and into court. The searches run for Mishawaka — the city's code of ordinances (which carries an ethics chapter, Ordinance 2016-7, covering interests in contracts, nepotism, political solicitation on duty and gifts, but no contractor-contribution bar of the pay-to-play kind), the press of record, and the court record — return no Mishawaka pay-to-play ordinance, no mayoral veto of one, and no injunction against one, at any date. The negative is printed at the strength of those searches: the fight never formed here, because the ordinance was never passed here.

The pattern, boundary-printed: The fight the pattern describes is Fort Wayne's, and it belongs to that city's file. Fort Wayne's ordinance, passed in 2017 and amended in 2018 — both times over Mayor Tom Henry's veto — barred business entities from bidding on professional-services city contracts if they or their principals had contributed more than $2,000 within a year to the officials awarding the contract. Allen Superior Judge Jennifer L. DeGroote permanently enjoined it in June 2019, in Kyle Witwer and Kimberly Suzanne Witwer v. City of Fort Wayne, 02D03-1904-MI-318. It is printed here at boundary size, as the measure of what Mishawaka does not have: no ordinance, no overridden veto, no injunction, no case number with Mishawaka's name on it.

Sources:

  1. City of Mishawaka, Code of Ordinances, ch. 36 (Ordinance 2016-7, passed 16 May 2016) — the ethics provisions searched; no contractor-contribution ordinance among them.
  2. The Indiana Lawyer, June 2019 — Judge DeGroote's permanent injunction against Fort Wayne's pay-to-play ordinance in Witwer v. City of Fort Wayne, 02D03-1904-MI-318.
  3. Searches of the press of record and court records for a Mishawaka pay-to-play ordinance, veto or injunction, run November 2026 — negative, as printed.

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: Pay-to-Play: the Pattern Across the State, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/mishawaka/city-controversies/test-one-pay-to-play-a-tested-negative-with/