MoosedHistory
Menu
Controversies

Controversies

Segregation in the Deeds: The Reachable Tests, and a Named Gap

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

The covenant test, from the deeds themselves

The test: racially restrictive covenants live in deeds and plats, not in town minutes — so this item is tested from the deed record itself: first, what of that record is reachable online for New Carlisle's plats; and second, what the county's documented pattern is, as boundary.

First reachable test — the Historic District nomination. The New Carlisle Historic District (National Register reference 92001653, added 14 December 1992; nomination prepared by Glory-June Grieff, May 1992) covers the main commercial district on Michigan Street in Olive Township, overlooking the Terre Coupee prairie. The nomination material reachable online in this section carries no discussion of racial covenants or restrictions in the district's deeds — a negative for the downtown commercial plats as far as that carrier reaches, and no more than that: a nomination's silence is not a deed search.

Second reachable test — the county pattern (boundary only). The documented St. Joseph County pattern is South Bend's and Mishawaka's, not New Carlisle's, and it is printed as boundary: the South Bend Tribune's 2002 account "Imprint of racism" documents the Normain Heights subdivision in Mishawaka — built for Second World War veterans and itself National Register-listed — whose deeds contained a Caucasian-only covenant; a homeowner quoted in the account had never seen it enforced, and the article's legal sidebar set the covenant in the Civil Rights Act framework. The wider Indiana context read alongside it: Monroe County's recorder-led project (from late 2021) mapping racially restrictive covenants in that county's deeds; such covenants were made unenforceable in law — Shelley v. Kraemer in the courts and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 — and Indiana's HB 1314 (2021) allows a homeowner to file a disclaimer against one. None of this is evidence about New Carlisle's plats; it establishes that the instrument existed in the county and the state in exactly the decades when New Carlisle's residential plats were being recorded.

The named gap. The town plats' own deed record is not reachable online: no plat or deed book for New Carlisle or Olive Township was available to this section, and the two reachable tests above cannot answer whether restrictive covenants were written into the town's subdivisions. This row therefore closes as a NAMED GAP. Settler: the St. Joseph County Recorder's plat and deed books — the recorded plats and deed books for New Carlisle's additions and Olive Township subdivisions, read for restriction clauses. Until that read is made, this section prints neither a covenant found nor a covenant absent for the town itself.

Sources:

  1. National Park Service, NPGallery / National Register record 92001653, New Carlisle Historic District (read 2026-11-11) — listing date, district description; nomination by Glory-June Grieff, May 1992, as reachable online, with no covenant discussion found in it.
  2. South Bend Tribune, "Imprint of racism," 2002 (read 2026-11-11) — the Normain Heights, Mishawaka covenant (county pattern, boundary only).
  3. Indiana University / Monroe County Recorder materials on racially restrictive covenants (read 2026-11-11) — the state context: Shelley v. Kraemer, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, Indiana HB 1314 (2021).

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: Segregation in the Deeds: The Reachable Tests, and a Named Gap, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/new-carlisle/controversies/segregation-in-the-deeds-the-reachable-tests-and-a/