MoosedHistory
Menu
Wineries & Distilleries

Wineries & Distilleries

Temperance as an actor — on plants that were not here, and on the town that was

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

To 1933 · OSCEOLA AND THE COUNTY

Temperance can only act on a plant where a plant stands, and on this ground none stood: no Osceola works was picketed, bought out, converted or closed by any temperance crusade in any record reached — the temperance-society and Tribune/Enterprise searches for action on a plant here return nothing because there was nothing here to act on, and that is printed as a finding, not elided. What the dry crusade did to the county's actual plants is boundary material, dated at art-58-3: Indiana's dry law and national Prohibition closed the county's brewhouses as plants (Kamm & Schellinger's run breaks at 1918 and resumes only with repeal in 1933), separately from the policing story. Osceola's own dry-years record is the banked Crime & Public Safety test — stills and raids searched for this ground across 1918–1933 and none seated here — and this article does not retell it; it adds only this section's distinction: enforcement found nothing to raid in Osceola for the same reason temperance found nothing to close — there was no plant, no still of record, and no works. The crusade's Osceola footprint, in the record reached, is the absence itself.

Sources: Banked Crime & Public Safety, dry-years article (1918–1933 searched negative); Kamm & Schellinger chronology; searches stated in the article (temperance-society records; Tribune/Enterprise files as reached).

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: Temperance as an actor — on plants that were not here, and on the town that was, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/osceola/wineries-distilleries/temperance-as-an-actor-on-plants-that-were-not/