The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.
Town Code and codified Title XV as read; Area Plan Commission record, 2024–2025
The town's land law begins with a conflict, and both sides of it are official. The town code's history section dates the town's first zoning ordinance to 1 May 1949. The codified ordinance tells a different lineage: the present zoning chapter (§151.001, from the 1989 code's §10-1) descends from Ordinance 40A, passed 11 July 1966, amended in 1975, 1977, 1982, 1990, 1991 and 1997. That a 1949 ordinance was replaced whole in 1966 would reconcile the pair, but no carrier reached says so, and the pair prints unmerged as conflict C33 — the town's land-use law carrying two birthdays, both in its own records. What followed is plainer. The town passed a Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance on 9 January 2025, on the Area Plan Commission's favourable recommendation of 17 December 2024; Roseland sits as a member town of the county's Area Plan Commission, alongside Lakeville, New Carlisle, North Liberty and Osceola. The planning shelf above it: the 2002 comprehensive plan for South Bend and St. Joseph County, which covers Roseland — and which also carries, as an official county statement, the explanation of the town's apparent 1990–2000 population jump as "the erroneous inclusion of part of the University of Notre Dame's married housing units in the Town," reported to the Census Bureau, narrowing the frame register's standing gap (G-FR-5) though the town's own Census Questionnaire Resolution determination remains unfound — and the county's successor plan, the St. Joseph County 2045 Comprehensive Plan, adopted 15 October 2024. The town's own comprehensive plan exists by the county's account — a 2021 county request for proposals says each member town has one — but its name and adoption date were not found, and stand as a gap. On the ground the plans govern, the commission's own words in a 2021 Roseland case give the town's character in one line: "just off of 933 in a neighborhood that has a mix of smaller commercial buildings and single-family homes." No industrial ground inside the town was identified in any carrier reached — an absence noted, not proven, matching the employer test in the businesses file.