The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.
ROW 82-11 · TESTED NEGATIVE · NOVEMBER 2026
The checklist asks whether this jurisdiction has exactly one Bitcoin prosecution to print whole. For this ground, it has none: the test was run across the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana's release record and the federal-court record as the open web returns them, swept for Granger addresses, Granger parties, and Bitcoin/cryptocurrency charges arising in St. Joseph County's northeast townships. No prosecution seated in the CDP — no defendant of this ground, no offense address on this ground, no victim firm seated here — appears in any release, docket report or press account returned. The district's crypto prosecutions that the sweep did surface arise from other ground (the Elkhart SIM-swapping defendants of the article above, charged in the Northern District of California after arrests here in the region, among them), and they belong to their home cities' builds at boundary size, exactly as this build's casino article (row 82-8, COVERED) leaves Four Winds to South Bend. The expected outcome the audit itself predicted — a printed negative — is therefore the outcome printed: there is no Bitcoin prosecution of this ground to print, whole or otherwise. Settler for any correction: the Northern District of Indiana's PACER docket, swept by party name and address, and the U.S. Attorney's release archive read entire.
Sources:
- Search record of this run, November 2026: justice.gov release sweeps (Northern District of Indiana; cryptocurrency/Bitcoin terms) and web sweeps for a Granger-seated crypto prosecution — no Granger case returned; the nearest returns are as described in articles 9 and 11.
- U.S. Attorney, Northern District of California release, November 2024 (the Elkhart SIM-swapping indictment) — boundary texture only, printed to show what the sweep did find.