The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.
TESTED NEGATIVE · LANDLORDS · GOVERNMENTS · PROSECUTIONS
Only collisions with the public record are printable facts, and on Granger ground there are none to print. The collision classes were tested one by one. Landlords: no club tenancy, no landlord dispute, no lease, eviction or nuisance action involving a swingers club, a couples' social club or a private social club on this ground appears in the reported case law or the openly indexed press — no unnamed tenancy at a named hotel either, and no named club of the floor instance's Champagne Club pattern. Governments: no zoning application, special-exception request, planning-commission item, council action or enforcement order concerning such a club in Granger or in the unincorporated county ground appears in the county's published zoning record or in the press (the county's standing provisions are printed in the next article, as law, not as a response to any club). Prosecutions: no prosecution, arrest or charging record touching such a club on this ground appears in the reported case law or the indexed press, and no Indiana appellate case tests the public-indecency statute or a zoning code against a club of this category at all (art-70-6). The searches were run under all the synonyms of art-70-3, and each returned the same silence. That silence is printed whole, as a finding of the classes named — not as a claim that no private gathering ever took place behind a private door, which the record can neither prove nor disprove (art-70-8).