MoosedHistory
Menu
Bank Robberies

Bank Robberies

Lore, tested separately: no Dillinger telling attaches to this ground

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

A town on the gang's own road usually keeps a Dillinger story; this one, in every carrier reached, does not. The lore test was run the way the build runs its folklore tests: the telling-stock for this ground was searched in its ordinary forms, and what surfaced was record, not lore — the Pierpont funeral and White City Inn facts of the crime article, sourced to the Historical Bureau's essay, with no embellished retelling, no "Dillinger slept here," no hidden-money or buried-loot telling, and no souvenir object (no car, gun, chair or room shown for a fee) attached to Lakeville, Indiana in any carrier reached. The near-name hazards were kept out by the build's standing discipline: Dillinger material for other Indiana towns, and gang lore for other Lakevilles, is not imported. The distinction the checklist demands is therefore printable whole: fact — a gang lieutenant's funeral at his parents' Lakeville home in October 1934 and a town court action against his mother's inn in 1937; lore — none collected, because none was found to collect. If a telling lives only in oral circulation, it stands outside every carrier this build may use, and the article leaves it there rather than inventing the telling it went looking for.

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: Lore, tested separately: no Dillinger telling attaches to this ground, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/lakeville/bank-robberies/lore-tested-separately-no-dillinger-telling-attaches-to-this/