MoosedHistory
Menu
Bank Robberies

Bank Robberies

The note-passer test: Moses was an uttering, not a series

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

State, 271 N.E.2d 446 (Ind. 1971), the banked appellate record

The only paper crime in this bank's record was tested as a series, and it is not one. The banked facts (lk-rem-crime): on 8 August 1969 Perry Moses tendered Indianapolis diamond merchant William P. Nicholas a forged $45,000 check and a letter impersonating the Central State Bank of Lakeville; cashier Robert Herbsten and teller Elizabeth Rowe testified the check was not the bank's and the letter not on its stationery; Moses was convicted of uttering a forged instrument, affirmed in Moses v. State, 271 N.E.2d 446 (Ind. 1971). The series test asks whether linked passings — the note-passer pattern, one hand working a route of banks or merchants — stand behind that single count. On the appellate record the build holds, they do not: the opinion carries one instrument, one tender, one victim-merchant, in Indianapolis; no second passing, no linked case, and no police linkage is stated in any carrier reached. The framing therefore prints exactly: Moses is a single forged-check uttering in which Lakeville's bank was impersonated — no Lakeville money moved, no premises entered — and not a note-passer series. A disposition beyond the affirmance (sentence served, later record) is not found in the carriers reached and prints as not found, per this section's discipline. Residue: the Tribune press file around the 1969–71 case, the settler that could surface a companion charge, was not read entire.

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: The note-passer test: Moses was an uttering, not a series, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/lakeville/bank-robberies/note-passer-test-moses-was-an-uttering-not-a/