MoosedHistory
Menu
Fashion

Fashion

The official count that names the trade — the census sentence, and why it cannot be quoted for this ground

The exact page text, read by your browser's voice.

1909 PATTERN · CENSUS OF MANUFACTURES, THIRTEENTH CENSUS

The checklist's opening pattern asks for one official sentence: the census or census-of-manufactures count that names a city's clothing trades at a date, the way the floor instance opens from the 1909 volume. The search for that sentence was run whole. The Thirteenth Census manufactures volumes (Volumes VIII–X, for the calendar year 1909) were located at the Census Bureau's own library and on the Internet Archive, and their structure was read: Volume IX reports manufactures by state, with detailed statements for the state by industry and for principal cities by industry — it does not publish a county table of clothing trades, and it publishes nothing at township scale at all. The 1909 classification list itself was read: it names the trade in the census's own words — classification 73, “Clothing, men's,” covering men's, boys' and children's clothing, overalls, uniforms and contract work on clothing; classification 74, “Clothing, men's, buttonholes”; with women's clothing, corsets, gloves and mittens and hosiery and knit goods carried as their own classes elsewhere in the list of 342. So the trade is named by the official count, at state and principal-city strength. South Bend is a principal city in that volume and its clothing figures exist at that level; Clay and Harris townships have no line, in 1909 or in any census-of-manufactures year, because the census of manufactures never tabulated two rural townships that contained no manufacturing establishment of the trade to count. Chapman (1880) and Howard (1907), read first-hand for the banked build, name no clothing factory, tailor's shop, milliner or dressmaker seated in either township. The leg therefore does not open from a quoted township sentence, because there is none to quote. NAMED GAP: the county-strength figure — St. Joseph County clothing establishments, wage-earners and value of product at 1909 and its neighbouring census years — would settle the size of the trade this ground's residents worked in and bought from; its settling source is the Census of Manufactures county tabulations as preserved in the published Volume IX Indiana section and the underlying county schedules, read at the St. Joseph County Public Library's local-history collection, a reading this open-source pass could locate and describe but not page through in full text.

Sources:

  1. U.S. Census Bureau, Thirteenth Census, Vol. VIII (Manufactures 1909, General Report), Vol. IX (Reports by States, with Statistics for Principal Cities — Indiana section listed), Vol. X (Reports for Principal Industries), census.gov library pages, consulted November 2026.
  2. Census of Manufactures 1909, Classifications by Industries (Government Printing Office, 1910), full text on the Internet Archive: classifications 73–74 and the 342-class list as quoted.
  3. Chapman (1880) and Howard (1907), township chapters for Clay and Harris, as searched for the banked build: no clothing trade named for either township.

Cite this page

Using this page? Copy a credit line. Last updated November 12, 2026.

Source: The official count that names the trade — the census sentence, and why it cannot be quoted for this ground, Moosed History by Project Moosed, https://history.projectmoosed.com/usa/midwest/indiana/granger/fashion/official-count-that-names-the-trade-the-census-sentence/